I built my own wi-fi stand with 7€ worth of hardware store supplies. It fits nicely to my 30€ nondescript tripod for my AP on a stick surveys.
It’s basically a 1000mmx25mmx1mm steel strip, bent in a rectangle and bolted fast to an iron plate. It is slightly wider than the usual 23.8mm (15/16″) ceiling rail.
In horizontal mount position, heavier APs like this Extreme Networks 3935 are a bit wobbly, but stable nonetheless.
The vertical position is done rotating the mount and attaching the AP sideways.
I can even fit an outdoor AP 3965 with its heavy mounting plate.
I simply hang the outdoor AP 3965 using the mounting plate and the pole mount straps. I insert the stand above for safety reasons, and use work gloves for handling the AP because of the pole-mount sharp edges.
This wifi stand may not be stylish or refined, but it’s very practical!
The Sybex CWAP 2011 study guide contains a gem regarding how different BSSs interact:
[with the exception of transmitter and receiver,] Any other client or AP stations within hearing range on the same channel will reset their NAV, even if they are nont members of the BSS.
Chapter 3 review questions, q.10, answer p.120
It is the first time I find it clearly stated that STAs contending through HCF or EDCA will abide to any information they can decode from received frames, regardless if they are from the same BSS or not.
This makes sense, because:
APs know the AID of the members of it’s BSS, but client STA don’t;
any STA (AP or client) does physical carrier sense SD when it decodes a preamble, and it is likely to also decode the header which contains a length field which is the time it will take to transmit the frame (in microsecs);
Therefore it’s logical to use a NAV if it can decode it.
Perhaps this should be put in the CWNA study guide explicitly.
Today I took the CWSP exam and passed it with 90%. It’s exactly one year after I passed CWNA and the satisfaction and sense of accomplishment is great. The original plan was to study during winter and spring 2020 in order to take the exam in April. Then the COVID19 pandemic hit and changed all our priorities.
The current exam was CWSP-206, which has an official study guide from Certitrek (authored by Badman, Bartz, Carpenter, Hill, Morgan) and an almost updated (CWSP-205) study guide from Sybex (authored by Coleman, Westcott, Harkins).
It’s good to study both books: the Sybex is a high quality reference guide to understand our work, and the Certitrek a more exam-oriented tool with great content, but somewhat poor editorial depth (e.g. no chapter/section navigation, no index).
I did not practice or setup a lab specifically for this exam, as most of my day to day work already touched most of the topics. Keeping up to date with blogs, Twitter and webinars was very useful, see my Twitter profile @MonorailHandles for my followed profiles which are almost all wi-fi related.
The CWNP practice tests were very useful to gauge my level of readiness and study the finishing touch. As with CWNA, the pass threshold is 70% and having scored 90% in the exam means I overstudied and delayed: chalk it up to an astonishing year with a pandemic, african locusts swooped over Milano by high altitude winds, and an earthquake near home.
Pearson Vue’s online proctored exam worked smoothly, I sat in an empty room at my office and the absolutely bare space may have helped the experience. It’s a good alternative to the physical exam center, in both convenience and comfort.
Now to the next thing: the original plan was CWDP, but my interests and professional curiosity drive me towards CWAP. Let’s see in the next weeks.
Early Aygust I was surveying one of the university buildings in Milano with my colleague. A heatwave was underway with outside temperatures of 35°C and in-building 30°C. We moved by bike, carrying survey kit and spare APs in my bike bags.
The building itself is interesting: a former cinema belonging to the nearby church, later rented by our university, the cinema transformed into a 200-seat lecture hall, the above floors offices. The view on the nearby XVI century church and art-nouveau buildings is wonderful.
We spent the morning surveying the building. Most of the time was used picking keys from a huge keyring and opening offices – then closing them again. After a couple of hours the tethered survey device was really hot and I didn’t want to stuff it back in the bag, even if it was turned off. So I found a creative solution:
Using all 5 Ghz channels available in your regulatory domain is not a choice, it’s a matter of fact. Here’s my experience.
I did a validation survey at one of our remote sites. The survey data showed severe co-channel interference almost everywhere. The site lies in open countryside and has no detectable neighboring APs: all of the APs are our own and they all transmit in the same 4 non-DFS channels as shown in the reading taken at location A on site:
Two weeks ago I was doing a survey with the iPad, when my Ekahau license was suddenly suspended. I was logged out of the Survey for iPad app and lost access to all my cloud files. After 9 days the license was restored, and all has been well since. Here is my experience and lessons learned.
My colleague and I are finally completing the retirement of a legacy 802.11n deployment based on Enterasys AP3600s.
It was our university first modern wi-fi network back in 2010, based on modern hardware and latest technology (802.11n was released in 2009). In the following years a few hundred AP3600s were installed on the campus and provided the bulk of our WLAN access.
Some wifi spotting (or wifi watching) at a hardware and home improvement store in Milano, Italy. I went there to buy a set of TORX tamper-resistant drivers to unscrew an old AP at the office and found myself looking at the ceiling all the time.
It’s a huge warehouse about 10m high with industrial metal shelves packed full of metal hardware, tools, building materials, piping, electric gear and wood sheets. It’s open to the public and there is a perpetual flow of customers, forklifts and elevating platforms.
The company opened 4 years ago, there is a good ethernet infrastructure at every cashier desk and aisle station, but the wireless gear was hard to spot.
Many PDAs and inventory scanners, forklifts. I did not take pictures of the handheld devices because the employees might have objected. Price tags on the shelves are low-tech.
I could not identify the devices that were hanging from the ceiling, some in a structured fashion, but pointed slantly across the aisles and not along it. Perhaps because the AP mount is not stable and the devices rotate freely.
Some devices were just hanging from the ceiling or the fire extinguisher piping, like jungle vine.
I recorded 97 BSSID with Airport Utility standing still near the cashiers. 92 BSSID were from a locally administered MAC OUI, 5 from universal OUIs. Here’s a list of the manufacturers:
00:A0:57 LANCOM LANCOM Systems GmbH
38:08:FD Silca Silca Spa
50:D4:F7 Tp-LinkT Tp-Link Technologies Co.,Ltd.
8C:34:FD HuaweiTe Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd
02:18:4A Locally administered MAC address
02:18:5A Locally administered MAC address
E2:55:7D Locally administered MAC address
The BSSIDs where evenly spread on 2.4 Ghz and 5 Ghz. The SSID list, redacted for privacy:
SES is a proprietary WPS solution from Cisco Linksys:
SecureEasySetup, or SES is a proprietary technology developed by Broadcom to easily set up wireless LANs with Wi-Fi Protected Access. A user presses a button on the wireless access point, then a button on the device to be set up (printer, etc.) and the wireless network is automatically set up. This technology has been succeeded by the industry-standard Wi-Fi Protected Setup.
Silca Futura is a key cutting machinery manufacturer, so the SSID comes from the locks and safes area.
WebPocket is a 4G mobile wifi hostspot device made by Huawei.
Do you know what kind of devices/solution is behind the 92 local mac addresses? The comments are there for you.